free web hosting | website hosting | Web Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | Promoter Online | php hosting
affordable web hosting Pets web page hosting web hosting website hosting web hosting service web hosting web host

"Belief, and the Will to Win"

Webmaster's Introduction

"de Jure" Map of Portugal

Portuguese Army Map and Olivença Flag

Olivença Timeline

Treaty of Alcanizes/Tratado de Alcanizes

Treaties Galore

War of the Oranges

Forgotten Alentejo-Map of Olivença

Great Britain and Olivença

Gibraltar and Olivença

National Press/Imprensa Nacional

International Media

Opinião Portuguesa

OlivençaNet/GAO

Forum Olivença

Portugal Claims/Reivindica Olivença

1000 Year Overview

Archive Guestbook

Point of View/Ponto de Vista

Questions & Answers

Olivença/Portugal Livre

E-mail-Contact Me

Links/Ligações:


Grupo dos Amigos de Olivença

"Crer e Querer para Vencer"


Forum Olivença

Manifesto Portugal

OlivencaOnline

Informação Olivença

Campanha por Olivença

Imigrantes

Ajuda Bridge Court Ruling Still in Force


Taliga's Church

The newspaper "El Periodico-Extremadura", in its edition of 23 October 2001, proclaimed with great delight that Spain would be able to rebuild the Bridge of Nossa Senhora da Ajuda , between Elvas and Olivença with the argument that the 'Providencia Cautelar' (a Precautionary injunction) which had been decreed on 15 July 2001 by the 12th Lisbon Civil Courts, to prohibit the Portuguese State from conceding Spain authorization for the "Dirección de las Carreteras" to proceed with restoration work to the bridge, had lapsed.

The Court had equally forbidden IPPAR (The Portuguese Institute of Architectural Heritage) to issue authorization to the Spanish proposal on the basis of the danger of violating Portugal's rights of sovereignty over Olivença.

After intense diplomatic pressure by Madrid, the Socialist Portuguese government instructed the Ministry of Public Works with the intention - without putting in jeopardy the 'de jure'/constitutional situation of the territory of Olivença - to contradict the effects of the 'Providencia Cautelar', and which it did in various ways, even by invoking that the judicial decision had lapsed, with the argument that GAO had not presented a 'Popular Action' within the time limit demanded by law.

In the event, GAO had not introduced into the judgement a 'Popular Action', because it had considered that interpretation the most correct by the Civil Process Code (Art. 389), when there was no time limit (10 days) in progress, seeing that the Plaintiff (GAO) had not been completely notified of the 'Providencia Cautelar' in the precise terms of the proceedings.

The representative from the Ministry of Public Works having requested that the 'Providencia Cautelar' (injunction) be declared lapsed and be lifted, GAO counteracted by offering its own opinion. The Judge of the 17th Lisbon Civil Court on 28 January (2002), by complete coincidence, reached a similar view to the GAO argument, and being entirely in agreement, therefore decided as follows: "On the evidence, I reject the request to declare the 'Providencia Cautelar' lapsed".

What this means is that the judicial decision handed out in July 2001 continues totally and exclusively valid, upon which it prohibits the issue of authorization by IPPAR and it impedes the Portuguese government in any way to authorize the "reconstruction" of the Ajuda Bridge by the Spanish authorities.


Source: OlivençaNet